1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 | One name: Dick Cheney. The international means of fact-checking elections involves comparing the exit polls. In 2004, they didn't match in certain key areas. Ironically RFK Jr. was the loudest voice pointing out that it didn't even meet the international standard for free and fair elections and a lot of the journalists at the time did everything they could to shut him down. It became a running thing. Bush didn't win 2004, Cheney used a little trick an evil genius in the Reagan administration came up with. But in 2004, (and 2016) they overplayed their hands and the biggest red flags were the racial discrepancies. Republicans polled worse and worse with minorities and women, and they were certainly not able to get them as easily brainwashed by Rush Limbaugh and Fox. And the more Republicans tried to take away women and minorities' ability to vote, the more those demographics made sure to do so. So in 2024 they made sure to fake JUST ENOUGH support that wasn't there, even though it required way more of Elon Musk's fishing expeditions (metaphorically) in voting and faking data everywhere. Here's a simple question for you all. If Trump got the same number of voters as last two elections; why are they suddenly more minorities and in demographics that have the most to lose from him (instant deportation of friends, family, all their money going poof, he purposely is punishing those districts by charging them more and withholding their own resources; etc.)? Who are the new first time Trump voters??? Anyone? BUELLER??? We already know Trump fakes polls, he was convicted in criminal court for it TWICE. Now the bigger question: why is anyone still acting like it wasn't fraud? -- One other key data point, and this is crucial. Democrats have been using the same cheating scheme since 2000 to hold back the Green party (Ralph Nader) and since 1988, the actually progressives in their own party (Bernie Sanders and AOC) in the primaries and siphoning and stealing on the margins. Not all of them, mostly ones that knew the evil genius and/or came from the Republican party but defected (thus having the most to lose ideologically from Bernie Sanders clear and present popularity.) A lot of the Democrats (Bernie Sanders, and Elizabeth Warren 100%) didn't know until just recently and I'm not sure they now KNOW-KNOW or just at least suspect, because the evidence is undeniable. But they did recently realize that a good portion of the Democratic party is corrupted beyond salvation. Joe Biden didn't know, but he's not off the hook because he knew Trump was dangerous and didn't use his Presidential authority to stop him -- though I think he genuinely might have tipped off Sanders. We might never be privy to that. Trump knows HRC knows, and called her out on it, 1/2 for fun, 1/2 so that she would concede if he out-cheated her and not tell everyone how the cheat works because she'd go to fucking jail. There's a reason he never jailed her. That's it. Mutual blackmail. "But Clinton didn't do anything to get jailed over." Neither did any other Dems being jailed right now. You think Trump gives a fuck? Also, the cheating is very very illegal and very very jail-able, but you know, she's at least smarter than Trump. Hakeem Jeffries and Chuck Schumer know. New York politics got worse around 2000, not coincidentally when certain Dems were in positions there, and they've been using it in primaries in NY. It sucks, I hate it. I don't know how to fix it either. I'm sure I sound crazy, but look at the data yourself. Math doesn't lie, but you can bet your ass off Republicans do. |
Direct link: https://paste.plurk.com/show/O7KrEFikSlM2kkhnf4Q0