1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
section 1: COMMUNICATOR: inmates should, if at all possible, be able to publicly address the barge and receive public replies!
section 2: DIRECT CONTROL: wardens are urged to avoid an extremely narrowly defined "puppetry" when punishing or subduing inmates.
section 3: INMATE CABINS: an inmate cabin should have a suitable atmosphere and toilet.
section 4: SEARCH AND SEIZURE: to be snappy, let's say a team of three wardens may argue they have the prerogative to search an inmate's cabin.
section 5a: DOUBLE JEOPARDY: a punishment, which is basically always more "creative" then just zero, should be given for each inmate incident. A single act of punishment may include multiple aspects, such as a no harm clause and a prohibition from entering certain locations. A second punishment may occur in the event of new information.
section 5b: PUNISHMENT ARBITRATION: although a paired warden is the only one who can request for the admiral to administer a punishment to an inmate, the paired warden is nevertheless asked to cooperate with an arbiter mutually agreed by the warden and inmate. However the reason for this to be necessary, beyond violating another vaguely defined "right" like "no torture", is kept vague.
section 6: INMATE AMENITIES: accouterments for the following should be available somewhere on the barge at all times and not removed as a punishment.
section 6a medical and disability aids; section 6b religious expression; section 6c gender identity and expression; section 6d health including food and appropriate shower
section 7: EXCESSIVE FORCE: wardens should use the absolute minimum force, whether physical or non physical, required to subdue an inmate causing a clear and present danger. This includes the extremely vaguely defined "torture", despite the encouragement of "punishments". Wardens avoiding use of excessive force against anyone outside of the barge is, I suspect they shall say, outside the scope of this document.
section 8: INVESTIGATION OF WARDEN ABUSE: if an inmate accuses their paired warden of abuse, the paired warden should cooperate with the selection of a mutually agreed third party warden to investigate. This does not account for an inmate alleging abuse against a warden *not* paired with them. Convenient.
section 9: BIG RED BUTTON: two wardens should be present and agree that this entire godforsaken ship would be blown up unless they press the big red button in the warden lounge that can kill certain supernaturally powered inmates.
section 10: ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE: Arthur compared a permanent Warden to an attorney and an inmate to a client. The warden is forbidden to disclose an inmate's "file" to a *third* party without vaguely defined good reason. That a warden is not freely chosen like an attorney and could in fact vow perfectly well not to read the file is beneath his concern.

(This is a draft!!)